Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venado Middle School

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. For those wondering, the "keep"s had a slight majority at the end. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Venado Middle School

 * delete as non-notable. Compare Weld Hall, which I voted to keep.  Can someone please explain to me the rationale of creating an encyclopedia article on every elementary, middle, and high school in California?   The world?  I mean, really, this phenomenon baffles me.  Is the intent to somehow increase your state's education budget or what?---CH  (talk) 21:54, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Rationale: All schools are inherently notable.--Nicodemus75 11:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * NN, D. ComCat 04:59, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand for the reasons provided at Schools/Arguments. Silensor 17:39, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Silensor. Hillman please remember our aim to to build a comprehensive encyclopedia and put the sum of human knowledge in the hand of every human being on the planet. Kappa 01:12, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. --Metropolitan90 01:59, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please agree with silensors reasons Yuckfoo 02:03, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per eventualism --Vsion 02:27, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Yet another verifiable permanent public institution to keep. Wikipedia can and should have articles on every enduring public institution and piece of infrastructure throughout history. Then it would actually be encyclopedic. --Gene_poole 03:31, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. --rob 03:37, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the grass is green. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 03:45, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing would be lost.  Vegaswikian 05:43, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. An article about a verifiable public insitution would be lost. Grace Note 06:53, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, perhaps an article would be lost if it actually was an article. Try creating when you actually know enough about the subject to write something more than one substubby line. - Mgm|(talk) 09:27, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I see a well-formed sentence that describes the subject of the article and where it is. A good stub, in other words. Grace Note 09:42, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Almost bicycle time.--Nicodemus75 11:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete substub on an unnotable school. About as notable as Nico's bike. Dunc|&#9786; 12:19, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. Klonimus 23:38, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete another generic middle school. Denni &#9775; 02:10, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. Christopher Parham (talk) 23:40, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable --JAranda &#124; yeah 07:34, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. *drew 08:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep schools. ··gracefool |&#9786; 22:06, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unworthy of inclusion -- red stucco 09:18, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this short stub. Has potential for to be expanded. --Andylkl (talk) 16:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments. I see no valid reason to delete this stub.  We should be encouraging this type of participation.    Un  focused  21:51, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all public schools. Gazpacho 23:58, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.