Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vendetta: a christmas story


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. . It seemed to be deleted already per WP:SNOW but now formalizing the close. Valley2 city ‽ 18:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Vendetta: a christmas story

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Short film that fails to meet WP:MOVIE criteria. No major coverage or awards found on Google. Film has IMDB entry, but not much more. ttonyb1 (talk) 21:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "Budget: $100", best sentence: "On January 24, 2000, the Internet Movie Databse (IMDb) added Vendetta to its listings, officially acknowledging Vendetta as a proper film." Priceless. Delete -- Noroton (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Cunard (talk) 22:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable film. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 22:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Also recommend sending link to this AFD to inclusionists for even more lulz. Ryan 4314   (talk) 22:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Oh, the humanity! And the lack of significance. Fails WP:N among others. Pigman ☿/talk 01:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable by independent sources. - Mgm|(talk) 10:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article was probably written by the person who donated the $100 budget. LargoLarry (talk) 14:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - IMDb entry doesn't actually mean film is a "real film" (e.g. proper film, studio production, etc.) Based on its official site, it appears to just be some persons homemade movie that they are giving away for free.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  14:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability. Having a page at IMDb does not at all establish notability since the database attempts to be comprehensive, not encyclopedic like we are.  Looks like snow to me... — Erik  (talk • contrib) 15:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, even speedy G11, nothing but someone's personal creation they are not attempting to promote here to give some attempt at legitimacy. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Leave it for a while I'm gonna be perfectly straight here. I'm the one who made the article. I'm NOT the creator of the film, I'm just a fan of it because I think it's funny. Honestly, the only reason I made the article at all is because I had to make a Wikipedia article about something for a school assignment. Just leave it for like 2 more weeks so I can do my assignment. Haha, a little sympathy please? Fruhtloops514 (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If you want to create a Wikipedia article successfully, the topic has to be notable. The consensus does not look in your favor, honestly!  If this is for a school assignment and if you want to cover a film, I suggest visiting WikiProject Films/Requests and doing a search engine test for any one of these topics to see if any of them are notable enough to write.  At least this way you will have an article that will stick around Wikipedia permanently! :) — Erik  (talk • contrib) 20:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Can you imagine if every teacher decided creating a Wikipedia article was a good assignment???!!! The AfD pages would go on forever. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

*Snow delete, non notable, no 3rd party coverage. Deletion Mutation 17:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC)  N.B. !vote of sockpuppet of blocked users struck through. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, and inclusion on IMDb does not make it so. I42 (talk) 15:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.