Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vendor lock-out


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  20:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Vendor lock-out

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The term 'vendor lock-out' appears to be a neologism that plays on the much more common term 'vendor lock-in'. The article was created four years ago but Google still only returns about 60 hits on the term, most of which appear to be blogs. The article also has no sources, and none are likely to be found.  Warren -talk- 23:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism. Alexius08 (talk) 08:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. Stifle (talk) 15:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not UrbanDictionary doktorb wordsdeeds 16:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources exist. -- how do you turn this on  18:20, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.