Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venetia Kapernekas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  So Why  14:57, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Venetia Kapernekas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails artistic notability guidelines. The article has promotional undertones and refers largely to self-published sources.  Dr Strauss   talk   18:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

She is not an artist, but an art dealer. Although she is not insignificant in the New York's art scene, the sources available on the net are mostly announcents on events happening in her gallery. The New York Art Beat website has a small piece on her, and there is wide coverage on the press of the settlement between her, and her ex-lover, art collector Udo Brandhorst, heir to the Henkel AG & Company (see for example the article of the New York Post). But it seems that this happens mostly because of Brandhorst; he is the famous guy. To conclude, I am for delete. ——Chalk19 (talk) 23:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.