Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venkateshwara Institute of Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Venkateshwara Institute of Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Too many issues by the templates already on the page. No RS with a BEFORE. Does not satisfy NSCHOOLS Vikram Vincent 04:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 04:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 04:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussi on has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 04:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution. We have always kept these by consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This editor is talking about some nonexistent consensus. Several AFDs where they have !voted keep have been deleted. Unless they come up with proof to support their "consensus" their vote needs to be ignored. Vikram Vincent 10:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That is unnecessarily personal. In fact, it has been long standing precedent to keep tertiary institutions.  Consensus can change, and the consensus has been swinging in this particular regard lately, but this comment indicates an unfamiliarity with history here.  Important factors can be, is it for-profit, who accredits it, and how long has it been in operation, does it have a substantial physical campus? Does it constribute to the body of published research?   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hola, ! Necrothesp and I have been sparring on multiple AFDs of a similar nature. Till date most of the nominated pages have been deleted. Yes, there was a consensus to keep tertiary educational institutions that did not have WP:RS to satisfy WP:NSCHOOLS but clearly states that consensus can change. Rather, if you have a look at these AFD stats one can gather that the consensus is changing to ensure that article of such nature strictly follow NSCHOOLS. VV 15:19, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES#2, Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions have enough coverage to be notable, although that coverage may not be readily available online. The point I have raised on multiple occasions is that these are only institutions affiliated to a university and are not degree-awarding in themself. In fact, there is a concept of "private deemed university" which would satisfy #2. Thus, the argument to delete. VV 15:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 13:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nice copy-paste throwdown you two keep doing. AdoTang (talk) 17:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to satisfy WP:NSCHOOL which says "For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria." Chirota (talk) 23:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I was unable to find multiple reliable sources addressing the organisation directly and in depth, therefore the organisation fails WP:NORG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Another one with no vipers nearby, no protests over cars hitting pedestrians, no shit flow diagrams, no internment of migrants during a pandemic. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:32, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.