Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venous needle dislodgement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Venous needle dislodgement

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is part of an advertisement for a company making a safety device to detect a type of accident during dialysis ; this part describes the accident & its potential consequences; the company, itself  Redsense Medical is described in the article at  the adjacent AfD. The references and content here does not meet the standards of WP:MEDRS. I presume there is COI, for trying to get 2 articles when there is at most a very weak case for one is a standard promotional  trick associated with paid coi editing.  DGG ( talk ) 03:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 September 18.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I am going to agree there is COI here with the two articles referenced. It is part self-referential (so advertising). (This is a bit out of date as new machines take and return on the one catheter. I am surprised to see this.) Nonetheless, delete. WP:PROMOTIONAL --Whiteguru (talk) 07:21, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I came here from the WP:MED article alerts with a desire to save this article, but jeez. Even if this is "cited" with many sources, it will never imo be "significant" coverage required by GNG. At most, this is a obvious side effect of hemodialysis, meaning almost all coverage is likely to be insignificant/in-passing by definition. Basically, while this may have tons of routine coverage, it's just that - there is no article on "IV line dislodgement" or similar because duh, it's a complication of a dang IV line by default - even if people pull their IV lines out daily, it isn't notable enough for its own article. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 03:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.