Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vent-Axia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  10:37, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Vent-Axia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP as written due to lack of substantive sources, and I was not able to find anything additional. Being an old company is not a claim to notability by itself. shoy (reactions) 21:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

The notability arises from the invention of the electronic window fan and not the age of the company. Paste Let’s have a chat.  22:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 21:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: The Vent-Axia section is lacking in detail. This OUP book could help enhance the history during the 1990s if some details about the prior history (APV?) and subsequent history can be found and blended. AllyD (talk) 11:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  23:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG/NCORP  HighKing++ 17:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep coverage is significant enough, and it's a well known brand. Peter James (talk) 17:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV. See the following peer reviewed sources:
 * Hope this helps.4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hope this helps.4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hope this helps.4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hope this helps.4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hope this helps.4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 21:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per 4meter4. The firm also appears in the OUP book A Long Time in Making (edit: which I realise AllyD already mentioned above), a history of Smiths Group, which bought Vent-Axia in 1992; the book also refers to it as then being "the leading commercial fan manufacturer".  If not keep, then Merge into Smiths Group. YorkshireLad (talk) 00:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Striking previous Delete !vote. I do not have access to the references posted by 4meter but given that they are described as peer-reviewed sources and that they contain in-depth information on the company, plus the book reference posted by AllyD previously, there is a high probability that multiple references exist that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 16:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Do these sources provide WP:ORGDEPTH? If they don't, a merge might be more appropriate. --MarioGom (talk) 12:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.