Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vent (building)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Vent (building)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a dictionary!! Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 10:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not just that, but also the fact that the information within that article is already mentioned within this one. AlphaBetaGamma DeltaEpsilonZeta 12:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:33, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't think WP:DICDEF applies here. Thing is, the disambiguation page Vent lists several types of vents "Related to moving gasses" and I'm not sure of the wisdom of having a more general article encompassing all types of, say, mechanical (as opposed to naturally created) "vents." Also, could I suggest the nominator quit punctuating all his nomination statements with multiple exclamation points "!!!". There's no crisis here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Also the article seems to be wrong in that it says vent applies to liquids, which I see is not covered at Vent? Anyway, I do agree to delete if only as WP:TNT, given its state. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete An unsourced and unnecessary fork of Ventilation (architecture). 64.183.45.226 (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.