Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VentureDNA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

VentureDNA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is essentially all press releases, with no particular claim to notability and a promotional flare its up here for the axe or a rewrite based on community consensus. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - fails CORP. Additionally, for what its worth, it was created by an editor just banned for undisclosed paid editing (see User_talk:Johnmoor) and the article's poor quality reflects that promotional basis. Jytdog (talk) 13:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per both of the above editor's reasons. --Gaff (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

A list of the sources in the article:     </li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol>Cunard (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)</li></ul>
 * Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. After searching for sources on Google and reviewing the sources in the article (reproduced above), I have been unable to find reliable sources that would allow VentureDNA to pass Notability. The sources primarily are press releases or passing mentions. Cunard (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.