Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venture Forth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Terri (film).  MBisanz  talk 03:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Venture Forth


( View AfD View log  for deletion/Venture_Forth Stats )

Article about a company which does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Yesterday I was looking at the logos for Black or White and there was no Sunlight Productions or instead we had Venture Forth on Google. Lifesavers2004 (talk)/(contrib) 21:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 17.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 23:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * merge to Terri (film), since it did exist. But it looks like it was indred a minor stunt, since it is not mentioned in its bio article. Lifesavers2004 (talk) 17:39, 18 March 2016
 * Note: This debate has been included in the List of Film-related deletion discussions. Lifesavers2004 (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I can't really parse the second sentence of the nomination into anything meaningful. Something about logos? Whatever. Anyways, the OP brings up WP:GNG. Looking online, I see this, which by itself doesn't meet the guideline. There are lots of stories about the various movies that the company has produced, but they don't really cover the production company in detail. So I suppose weak delete, with the note that I could probably be convinced to change my !vote if one additional decent source could be found. The page might be more appropriate as a redirect to Jacob Pechenik, who likely does meet our notability guideline. Disagree with the proposed redirect to one of the company's movies, as it doesn't seem any more related to that one than all the others. VQuakr (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion was started by a now blocked sock of User:Hallerworld. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 15:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: The company lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 16:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.