Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venture One diving accident


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Cormorant oilfield and add a brief mention. Daniel (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Venture One diving accident

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A diving accident that does not seem to pass WP:EVENT. The cited sources are the report about the accident and a book listing people who died of diving accidents in 20th century. The only other coverage of the incident that I found is this site that lists the event among other diving accidents. Found no suitable place to redirect this article to. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  15:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Scotland. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: No historical coverage of the event, nothing in Gbooks or scholar. Sourcing is almost entirely from a tech report on the accident; doesn't make it notable, it's an accident investigation required by law. I can't find any sort of lasting effect of the event. Oaktree b (talk) 15:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - I agree that it is concerning that the article is almost entirely sourced from the fatal accident report. I had a quick look to see if I could find newspaper coverage and the incident was reported in The Glasgow Herald (11 May 1977) the day after it occurred, largely focusing on the fact that it was unclear why Craig Hoffman had collapsed, though this was a relatively small story on p.3. This on its own is unlikely to be enough to satisfy notability requirements, but I do wonder if there was significant coverage in other news material or anything in any histories of the North Sea Oil industry. Dunarc (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Redirect is a potential AtD, but it needs to be added at the targt to be suitable. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: This isn't listed at Cormorant oilfield. If this activity were related to that field, then it should be briefly included there, and would be a redirect target given apparent lack of sigcov and WP:SUSTAINED. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 05:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect and add a brief mention to Cormorant oilfield per above. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Cormorant oilfield and add a mention there. No significant coverage, and the article is essentially a regurgitation of the official report. Thebiguglyalien  ( talk ) 19:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.