Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veracity (data)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is this isn't suitable for an article, and there isn't anything worth merging. If someone wants to work on this in draft space, just ask Star   Mississippi  23:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Veracity (data)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't see how this article could be improved to anything more than a dictionary entry, which is not something that belongs on Wikipedia. 4906h (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 4906h (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify: The nominator claims to be ignorant and unable to have vision, which is always worrying and a little more practice at contributions might help. I've never come across the term up till now myself, so perhaps I'm getting a little out of touch, but I could probably bluff a sales pitch for 20 minutes to the management on it if I had to without having read a word of the research.  There's a risk this is a neologism, but big data is here to swamp us, and in the old days I think we used to say garbage in garbage out which probably is the gist of some of the same thing.  Unfortunately not fit for mainspace in current state and would need to show a little better content and tone before fit for main space.  I'f someone pumps the the article constructively I'd likely be willing to swing to keep. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge: This is obviously a cited blurb of meaningful content which should be merged into something else such as data integrity. — Smuckola(talk) 19:38, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete since we are not a dictionary, nor promoter of faddy neologisms. There was a proposal to merge into big data (which is not a proper noun, unless you are in marketing), but not really needed in my opinion. W Nowicki (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No content worth merging. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with XOR&#39;easter (talk). Nwhyte (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.