Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veraz Networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Veraz Networks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

trivial company with trivial notices as the only references.  DGG ( talk ) 01:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- on the face of it, the company could be notable being WP:LISTED, but I'm mostly seeing PR-driven coverage in industry press. The only truly independent mentions are in relations to a government complaint that the company settled for $300,000 (having spent $3M in legal fees prior): link. This does not seem sufficient for notability, and the article is so promotional that WP:TNT applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as clear PR advertising regardless of anything because what's important here is WP:NOT. SwisterTwister   talk  04:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.