Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VerbalArt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 17:48, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

VerbalArt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mildly promotional article for new magazine, no independent sources with in-depth coverage, does not meet WP:GNG Randykitty (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - No independent reliable sources for notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent coverage, fails WP:GNG and WP:NMAGAZINE. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - This journal is still in its first volume and lacks coverage in independent sources. It might become notable at some point, but it isn't yet. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - As WP:TOOSOON - Only two issues to date, and no way to assess whether it will become notable in time. - Arjayay (talk) 13:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree--too soon to tell if it's going to be notable ``
 * Delete as searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  06:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unable to find anything to indicate it's notable enough. On a related note, the creator of the article is using Wikipedia as a promotional platform, as evidenced by the multitude of pages created and by the promotional nature of said pages before being cleaned up. Elaenia (talk) 02:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.