Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vericracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:SNOW and WP:G3 - obvious hoax. The Bushranger One ping only 02:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Vericracy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 18:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 18:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

This looks suspiciously like a hoax. It's unreferenced except to other Wikipedia articles. I searched on JSTOR and Google Scholar and the term isn't used. Can't find any usage in any reliable sources. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, as it stands, this is complete WP:SYNTH not back by any WP:RS. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 15:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - there's nothing here, just WP:MADEUP / SYNTH, no sources. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:51, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. This appears to be a neologism. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:21, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any reliable sources that mention this term - in fact, I can't even find unreliable sources that do. Nwlaw63 (talk) 16:51, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 17:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.