Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veritas Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 16:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Veritas Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No covg. in RS.Fails WP:GNG. Winged Blades Godric 09:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 09:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 09:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 09:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep and move. Or keep/merge with parent. Whatever about coverage under the title 'Veritas Communications' (which seems to be the official rather than commonname), the subject company, 'Veritas Publications', would seem to be subject to coverage under its current COMMONNAME title (and indeed its past title). It is otherwise relatively well-known (under either title) in Ireland. For myself it seems that perhaps the creator should have considered using the common rather than the official name of this entity. Which may better aid in GNG/NCORP verification.. Guliolopez (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmm...that brings up some more GHits:) But, I am still not seeing enough indep covg. in RS for an outright keep !vote.A merge could be definitely done with ICBC. Winged Blades Godric 19:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * WP:HEY, KEEP I added a little WP:SIGCOV form WP:RS. Notability of this publisher is readily established in new archive searches that bring up articles about, review of notable books that Veritas has brought out.  Editors should beware PRESENTISM; major news articles form the 70s 80s and 90s are unlikely to come up in searches.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Obviously keep -- It looks like the publishing house of the Catholic Church in Ireland, where Catholicism is the dominant religion. If so, it should certainly be notable.  If the current article name reflects the company name, we should retain it, but Veritas Publications might be allowed as a redirect to it, if that is a commoner name.  It is currently a redirect to Irish Catholic Bishops' Conference.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:57, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.