Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verma v.s. brewer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Angr/ talk 12:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Verma v.s. brewer
An obvious hoax, no ghits for case, someone created fake ACLU article earlier about lawyer, also no ghits. Delete Oh, right, prodded, de-prodded. Mak emi 05:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete either a hoax or a recounting of something that happened to the editor. --djrobgordon 08:23, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 10:02, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless verified. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 10:33, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless verified. -- Vary | Talk 17:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom, not verifiable. -- Samir ∙ TC [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|  ]] 00:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: User:Llbag51289 took the liberty of changing the above delete votes to keeps.   No need for me to pile on here, this nonsense will be deleted in due time.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 09:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable -- Alpha269 16:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this guy is putting up a whole bunch of hoax/joke articles. He already has a bunch of vandalism warnings; a few more of these BS articles and I'm putting him on WP:AIV. Daniel Case 05:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax Wangfoo 20:11, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.