Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermillion Lies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Vermillion Lies

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

fails WP:GNG ---FMSky (talk) 07:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Bands and musicians,  and Music. FMSky (talk) 07:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I did find a few sources,this one from a local newspaper called Monterey County Weekly while it appears to be independent from the subject and there is some decent coverage, it is a local newspaper and the article has a pinch of "oh goodie! the local gals are back", this one is from 2007 published in the Register-Guard  has a small write up abouth the sisiters,their show and instruments. Arguably the best coverage of the article appears in this NPR piece from 2007 . The sources which are already on the article are from Monterey County Weekly  which is not full accesible without paying and thus the exact quality of coverage can't be determined also, there are 2 more sources from Taos News at the bottom of that page which are no longer accesible and are not available on the Taos News website either. The one from Curve magazine does appear entirely promotional at first but it might have some coverage  but, once again its behind a paywall. If someone could confirm the quality of the Curve sourceor the Taos News sources, find other sources  then I'd think about a "weak keep".  Bingo bro   (Chat)  09:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources provided by Visviva. Bingo bro   (Chat)  08:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting given that additional sources exist if there is anyone who has the ability to evaluate whether or not they help to reach GNG. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think the sources above quite get us to WP:GNG especially considering the article is written fairly promotionally. SportingFlyer  T · C  15:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep, I am not overwhelmed by the quality of the sources but the following clips from Newspapers.com seem like they could provide sufficient sourcing for an adequate article:
 * Lies can be really fun (Michelle Theriault, Statesman Journal (Salem, OR), 2007-02-08)
 * Madcap mayhem (Deonne Kahler, Taos News / Tempo Magazine, 2008-03-13) (continued)
 * Gorey sister act (Christina Troup, San Francisco Examiner, 2008-01-24)
 * Uniquely twisted folk ruckus (Deonne Kahler, Taos News / Tempo Magazine, 2007-04-04) There might be more in other databases, but I would expect that this is pretty representative of the coverage. -- Visviva (talk) 02:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep in view of the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this AfD from newspapers and magazines that together show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.