Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermin Poets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Billy Childish. Clearly doesn't pass WP:MUSIC as it stands, redirected to the notable member's article to preserve the history should it be able to be improved. Black Kite 23:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Vermin Poets

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Do not be deceived by the apparent references. The BBC page is just a playlist and the other does not appear to be a reliable source. Notability is not inherited from the members of the band. Unless and until this band becomes notable in its own right it is just like so many other non notable bands and has no place here. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 18:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I have tagged the article for rescue. Silver  seren C 18:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Perhaps the best approach would be to add some of this article's material to the Billy Childish article, and let this article be deleted. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete My opinion remains the same as above, especially if some other editor adds to the Billy Childish article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Please do not vote twice. it makes it seem like you are trying to game the system. Silver  seren C 21:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You know, the first time most people see "relisted" they wonder whether they should restate their view. I know I wondered the first time. This editor made it clear that their opinion was as stated previously and did not deserve that hard slap. It is quite sufficient to tell someone that it is not necessary to restate an opinion stated above the relisting line. Please educate and remember to assume good faith and don't slap. Any irony perceived may have been intentional. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, i've just had a lot of people doing that lately. I didn't mean to slap, my fault. Silver  seren C 07:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable doesn't necessarily mean famous or wealthy. They are established and have published their first album.  Only time will tell whether they publish more albums or hit the charts in a big way but since they are already noted then any discussion on our part whether they are notable is simply a matter of perspective from people who don't know them and are not qualified to summarily dismiss them. Aaron Walkhouse (talk) 05:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.