Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermont Auditor of Accounts election, 2012


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Vermont elections, 2012. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Vermont Auditor of Accounts election, 2012

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does every minor office's election get an article? Ratzd&#39;mishukribo (talk) 02:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. If this election is not notable enough for a standalone article, the obvious merge target is Vermont elections, 2012. That article needs to be updated. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree with the above merge comment. I can't see notability for this race. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge. Agree with above comments. Mostly in general article already. Student7 (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The 2006 election for this office has its own page. If a Merge, may make sense to merge some of the information into the Vermont Auditor of Accounts article.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 12:48, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * merge to Vermont elections, 2012 as there is not enough info to justify a stand-alone article. Vermont Auditor of Accounts election, 2006 should be likewise merged to Vermont elections, 2006; while there is more than routine result information in that article (the initial results were reversed in a recount), it isn't as though there isn't room for that in the main article. Mangoe (talk) 13:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge per above, and yes, should initiate a merge for 2006 as well. Dengero (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.