Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vernon Heywood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - boldly closing early per the snowball clause - Peripitus (Talk) 10:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Vernon Heywood

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not Particularly Notable WP:BIO Llamabr (talk) 19:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Chair Emertius of Botany at Reading, leading figure in modern botanical taxonomy, 800 Google Books results, over four thousand Google Scholar results, one paper cited 443 times using their rudimentary citation system. Passes WP:PROF with flying colors. --Dhartung | Talk 03:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 04:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep on the basis of what Dhartung said. He really is notable. --Eastmain (talk) 04:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added an award that he won recently, filling out another entry of WP:PROF in case we needed more. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dhartung's and David Eppstein's comments. Passes WP:PROF by well over a mile. Nsk92 (talk) 05:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Well referenced, clearly notable. No issues here. Pedro : Chat  09:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.