Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronika Zemanová


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Veronika Zemanová

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Little indication of notability; a google search indicates a couple of sources, but they appear to be exclusively forums or blogs, sites which present wikipedia's own material, and social networking sites.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  19:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment yes, little chance of scholarly articles on this subject. Establishing notability in the normal way will be impossible or difficult. However one factor which I believe the google searches show is this nude model's fame - explain: In the UK (and possibly Europe) this nude model was in the 80s and 90s famous in her chosen career. As far as I know she did not model much for magazines in North America. Basically it is difficult to understate her fame in the area of 'mens magazines' during that time period. I think that needs to be stated for anyone who needs a cluestick on this one. See the multiple interwiki links for this title which give a clue as to the relative fame of this subject. (or turn safe search off and do an image search for "zemanova" ~699,000 images which is more than the olsen twins per twin..)
 * However the article is unlikely to ever amount to a good encyclopaedic article given the subject area, and there is really very little to say about the subject. Probably an odd example where fame does not confer notability. Sf5xeplus (talk) 20:29, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Number of hits for a keyword search on the model's name doesn't confer notability. And with the regards to the Olsen twins, WP:OTHERSTUFF. There needs to be non-trivial coverage in reliable sources per WP:GNG.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  20:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I disagree. Do not delete. mind your own business. --Jo (talk) 22:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Please note that arguments which are not based on policy or do not address the issues will be disregarded by the closing admin, and uncivil and unjustified "votes" are simply disruptive. Wikipedia is not a democracy and we don't work by counting "votes"; make a valid, policy-based argument or it'll simply be disregarded.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  22:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Veronica is indeed very famous. She has appeared for playboy and other major magazines, and has accomplished as much as any other porn model. if you delete here page, you will have to delete a lot of other pages. Personal attack removed  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  16:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC) --Jo (talk) 20:12, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, I do not see any significant coverage in the usual sources online. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete does not meet WP:BIO, imdb only independant source AlgebraT (talk) 04:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't even really claim notability. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable Infinitely Humble (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.