Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Versandhaus Walz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Given the low participation in the debate, no prejudice against renominating in a month or so. Randykitty (talk) 18:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Versandhaus Walz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Source searches (1, 2) indicate this company has not accrued the depth of coverage in independent, reliable sources to be considered notable.  SITH   (talk)   12:36, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, considering also sources in German Wikipedia. Their "baby-walz" brand used to be the largest mail order / online retailer of baby products. "Die moderne Hausfrau" also has lots of hits, consider, . Will need redirects from all the relevant brand names. —Kusma (t·c) 09:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.