Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Versistasis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. With respect to the concept, no notability via WP:GNG, also it's WP:OR. With respect to the term, WP:NEO. joe deckertalk to me 21:02, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Versistasis

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The PROD on this article expired, but comments on its talk page mean that deletion is contested, so I bring it here. It is about a book, and about a neologism used in the book to describe a "type of time" and a "pan-ultimate definition of reality". An IP, probably the article author, says on the talk page that "Its only a reference to the book, the topic is metaphysics." The first reference does not seem to mention the subject, the second is a blog, the third is the author's own site. Fails WP:No original research, WP:NEO and WP:Notability (books). JohnCD (talk) 10:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom: as noted on the article's talk page, I can't find a single mention of the term online outside of self-published promotion for the self-published book, which is also non-notable per WP:Notability (books). Scopecreep (talk) 10:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 13:14, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research and meaningless: ....the novel expounds a theory of everything, deposing the objectivity/subjectivity typical in traditional logical equations of reality, by a post-modern rhetoric. Versistasis defines the forces typical in creation as being fractal concurrent powers, such as those typical of the planetary bodies in a astrological interpretation and of the human qualities inherent to them and the material universe. Wow!  Postmodern rhetoric can do all that? - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

oh wait, lets back neo-hyper-modernsism instead, maybe that will solve the global debt crisis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.166.211.118 (talk) 12:27, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.