Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vertical thinking vs. Lateral thinking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Vertical thinking vs. Lateral thinking

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Personal essay, almost completely unsourced and much original research with heavy use of WP:Synthesis per WP:No original research. What's left when you remove the essay and reflection is already covered in lateral thinking. Prod contested by anonymous editor. Gurt Posh (talk) 16:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 16:33, 22 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as original research. Several Times (talk) 16:36, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research and unsuitable for inclusion.  Blue Rasberry    (talk)   16:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * delete per nom, per !voting other editors, and per fact that this borders on wp:nonsense anyway. &mdash; Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The purpose of thinking is to collect information and use it in the best possible manner. The mind works to create fixed patterns from the surroundings, after which they can be used, and they become firmly established. Thus, the mind provides a special environment for information to organize itself effectively.  The presence of vertical thinking and lateral thinking also suggests that this may be a content fork, although those articles are not much better than this one.  No prejudice to creating and unifying all of those articles somewhere, and this title may be the logical place. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:OR. Joe Chill (talk) 22:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.