Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vertroleum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Fram (talk) 14:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Vertroleum

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Advertising thrice deleted, Creator asserts significant brand name and encyclopedic content. .   Dloh  cierekim  13:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

The information on Vertroleum is no more nonsense or blatant promotion than articles for Coca-Cola or Ipods. It IS information on a product that deserves looking at. If it is deleted again I will honor and not contest but I still do not understand the difference in this article and those posted by companies and individuals touting other products. I have read rules for posting and in MHO a good many product listed here also break those rules. Again just my 2 cents DMMc (talk) 13:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * delete Except those are well established products with a cultural significance and independent citations as such. Yours isn't.
 * Comment Too clarify, Ipod and Coco Cola meet the "household name" test of WP:N. We forget sometimes that new users are not as knowledgeable about policies as we are. Cheers,   Dloh  cierekim  14:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - blatant advertising, no sources listed. Tnxman307 (talk) 13:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * You are correct...I am a new user and I do understand. I will endeavor to post better in the future. DMMc (talk) 14:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My first article got deleted too. < > Dloh  cierekim  14:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, WP:CSD A7 and G11: absolutely no indicia of notability, and obvious advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertisement for a non notable product.--Berig (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Spam. Yes, in theory the product could be notable. However, no independant sources confirm this: none provided, none found. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete via A7 or G11 for a promotional article on a non-notable product. And to the author: don't worry, writing an article from scratch has a rather steep learning curve. B figura  (talk) 22:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - this article has already been deleted three times and has not been improved at all. It's advertising. Rob Banzai (talk) 16:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.