Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veruca James


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Veruca James

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. We have clear and strict notability requirements for porn performers, with three specific criteria; this person does not meet any of the three. Note: this is an area of Wikipedia that I have no interest in and have managed to avoid until now – so please excuse any mistake or misunderstanding, and forgive me for having skipped WP:BEFORE on this particular occasion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: see also Articles for deletion/Alix Lynx. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly a notable porn actress. Makro (talk) 20:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject fails WP:PORNSTAR, WP:GNG, and WP:ANYBIO. There's more coverage of her online (pun intended) but it's brief mentions (another pun) so I don't see general notability. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - I presume L.A. Weekly is the only one valid reference.Guilherme Burn (talk) 00:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Nowhere near notable. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:42, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and . —Compassionate727 (T·C) 12:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment The first item in WP:PORNBIO is awards and the article links to a source (not necessarily an WP:RS) that notes a bunch of awards. Do any of these count toward item 1.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No, and the reason is that none of those awards which this person actually won are well-known and significant. Many of them are also for scenes, which don't apply. The AVNs are important, but this person never actually won any of them (just was nominated). —Compassionate727 (T·C) 12:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per Compassionate727 response.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete total failure of both the GNG and the guidelines for performers in pornographic productions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete handwaves towards notability does not actually equal evidence of reliable sourcing to meet GNG or even the discredited and overly generous PORNBIO. Spartaz Humbug! 09:11, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. Clearly, Boobpedia.com is not a reliable source. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  18:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as No evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.