Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veruli (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Girth Summit  (blether) 11:56, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Veruli
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

I tried but can't find significant coverage in reliable sources or evidence that satisfy WP:NFILM. Most of the sources mentioned in the previous AfD are mere announcements or are not directly about the film. The film was released back in 2017, but I can't find a single full length review. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 04:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 04:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 04:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I found a review at [] Donaldd23 (talk) 11:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * nettv4u.com isn't a reliable source per WP:ICTF. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 14:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for directing me to that. I concur and my comment above can be ignored.  Thanks! Donaldd23 (talk) 14:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I was about to say WP:TOOSOON and then realized it was release in 2017. If reviews have not come so far, they are not likely to. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 15:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - plenty of sources existed online and have now been added to the article. Please do simple Google searches before you post films for deletion - in depth of coverage was quite easily available here and . A review from Maalai Malar is also included. Neutral Fan (talk) 21:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Both the sources you provided above are interviewers and WP:NFILM require full-length reviews by "two or more" nationally known critics so that single review won't help. Also, a Google news search revealed only 17 results (that's not plenty) and almost all of them are either passing mentions or announcements. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 06:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Anything wrong about interviews? There are two reviews. Google news is fine for English films - this isn't an English film. Neutral Fan (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Interviews are not independent as all the material except for the questions is straight from the person. Independent of the subject excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. and the reliability of iflicks.in is WP:QUESTIONABLE. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hmm, not Q+A interviews per se - the latter seems to be an editorial article with featured quotes. As do several other sources from India's most reliable print publications. Either way, the article looks very different to how it started off. Neutral Fan (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: Well sourced, with at least two reviews. Kailash29792 (talk)  08:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * As I pointed out above the reliability of iflicks.in is questionable and rest of the sources are not even close to meet WP:SIGCOV they are either passing mentions or interview kind of articles and a few unreliable sources such as filmibeat.com, simplicity.in and spotify.com. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 09:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources don't appear to add up to significant, independent coverage Dexxtrall (talk) 19:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry but how? Significant coverage appears on almost all the sources listed. That too from the most notable Indian newspapers... Neutral Fan (talk) 22:11, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * As I pointed out above, almost all the sources are either passing mentions or interview kind of articles. There is no such coverage that establish notability. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I advise you to please recheck the sources which talk the film, such as this, this, this and this. Kailash29792</b>  (talk)  07:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
 * From sources your provided above, the first one talk about the actor and his role in the film its not about the film, second one is an interview with its director again not independently about the film, the third source is about "Syed Subahan" where the name of the film is mentioned only twice and again the article is not about the film and the last one is again an interview (not independent) so they are basically useless in establishing notability. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 08:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree with that WP:NFILM is not met.  Celestina007 (talk) 17:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Given that IFlicks is owned by Daily Thanthi Group, it has some merit but the gossip column makes it harder to argue that it's reliable. There is no About Us or Contact Us page, so the publication process / editorial oversight is unclear to meet the standard of WP:NFSOURCES. Other Tamil-language sources should be explored. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.