Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vested business brokers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Vested business brokers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails on WP:ORG. Article is unsourced. Not enough coverage in reliable sources either. Being tagged for notability concerns since June 2012. Hitro  talk  21:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - This looks like an easy case. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the above. Alaynestone (talk) 00:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   05:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete No significant coverage. Fails WP:ORG.  I agree with editor CoffeeWithMarkets, this looks like an easy case. But nonetheless it was relisted. Oh well, it is not like I had a train to catch.  Gee, they have their own website, and directory listings, and you can view client testimonials on YouTube! It does have an importance claim (See A7), if you believe the staff-written bio of Ms. Goldstein at the NY Senate website: The company is the largest privately held company specializing in the sale of privately held businesses, with over 3,500 listings. With that kind of standing, would one not expect greater coverage?  Given the tenor of the complaints listed at US-Complaints.com maybe an investigative business reporter can get a Pulizer.  Try WP:SNOW.  For the record, the article was created in June 2012‎ by a WP:SPA.  --Bejnar (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.