Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (third nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep John254 02:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (third nomination)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable group. Most references are from blogs. There does not appear to be much coverage from notable sources. Pablothegreat85 08:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Fox News, NYT, Washington Post are not blogs.  This organization is well known and cited in numerous other WP:RS's. csloat 09:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources are unmistakably sufficient--and, as mentioned a small number of what could be found, The names of the leaders indicates why they are considered notable by so many news sources. DGG 00:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Nothing has changed since the first and the second nominations. Both nominations showed a overwhelming consensus that the group was notable, and csloat restates the reasons above. Simon12 00:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.