Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vfr simulations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete. Awyong J. M. Salleh 03:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Vfr simulations
Note: I have redirected the talk page of the AfD to here so that people don't put their opinions there (some people have done so) by mistake and have them ignored. Veinor (talk to me) 23:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable corporation; I can't find any independent sources for this. Veinor (talk to me) 21:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete 40 hits on Google, no reliable sources - PoliticalJunkie 23:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * One Reliable Source This source is the vfr simulations 2006 Official Report, www.vfrsimulations.com/archive.html Has all the info a Wikimaker would ever want.
 * Comment Reliable sources have to be independent of the subject; that one obviously isn't. Veinor (talk to me) 23:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * note The closer of this AfD should also have a look at the talk page of this article at Talk:Vfr simulations, as there are people voicing opinions there. —— Eagle 101  Need help? 23:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks For bringing that up, Sir
 * Speedy delete no assertion of notability per WP:CORP; the sole "claim" of "very popular" is not backed up by any figures at all, let alone reliable sources. And force original creator to read WP:CORP a hundred times. Awyong J. M. Salleh 00:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Well to be honest, I remember VERY well that there was a man named that would come on the server and harass us. He tried to take over the server several times, but was not successful. But anyway to get back on track, VFR Simulations is a very successful online server in my eyes.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.