Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viancey Taveras


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As for the "don't delete" !vote, having independent reliable sources is a prerequisite for having an article on Wikipedia.Rlendog (talk) 15:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Viancey Taveras

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article created by SPA who keeps removing maintenance tags. Subject has no GNews or GBooks hits, and the small number of Ghits are either mirrors of the Wikipedia article or the subject's own, self published PR. No reliable sources. Subject fails all relevant SNGs as well as the GNG by wide margins. Previous versions of the article, under the title Viancey, have been repeatedly deleted, and this may be subject to speedying as a repost, as well as calling for a bit of salt. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Only sources are his Myspace and a directory entry. No evidence of notability. At best this is WP:TOOSOON. AllyD (talk) 20:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly no notability demonstrated. Go for speedy. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 22:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Dont Delete He is a signed artist and has some notability. Just needs more source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Info247 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.