Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viatrophy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Viatrophy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notability is probably reason enough. A couple of mentions in music magazines doesn't seem sufficient. Seegoon (talk) 21:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Whoever made this article does know that Viatrophy have split up now, right? Anyway, aside from this article being incredibly low quality, I agree that the band isn't notable. They never achieved any real heights of popularity, even in the UK underground, hence their dissolution. I say delete. Ngk44 (talk) 14:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.