Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viber BI (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Viber BI
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO, doesn't meet WP:BIO, sources are not that much reliable and are press release. Owlf  📪  18:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Asia,  and Nepal.  Owlf   📪  18:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was Withdrawn.
 * Previous discussions:
 * Logs:  ←   ←
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Deltete as per nom and it fails to show WP:GNG. Fade258 (talk) 08:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - Google sources include links to their Wikipedia article, Instagram, Spotify channel, Youtube channel, Apple music, Celebwiki, Lyrics, Facebook etc. Nothing on Wayback. Nothing on Newspapers.com. Source one in the article appears promising on its face, but clicking the link takes one to a bunch of press releases that in addition to not being independent, have nothing to do with the article subject. Other sources within the article are trivial and lack independence, such as this brief coverage merely rehashing a press release. As such, the person at centre of the article has not been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent meaning they clearly fail the first criteria for singers, with none of the subsequent criteria met either. I also note that the subject is said to be a writer of songs, I do not see any writing of notable compositions or the other criteria for composers. Overall a strong case this article fails WP:NMUSIC. MaxnaCarter (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG; WP:MUSICBIO. No significant coverage/impact. No chart placings. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.