Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vibert F. Greene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tim Song (talk) 16:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Vibert F. Greene

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Candidate lacking in notability. No claim of notability in article (simply being a candidate does not mean automatic notability -- all he needed to do was file a statement of intent, open a bank account for his campaign, and pay a filing fee). Gnews search turns up only a passing mention of a poor performance in a 2006 local election. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  15:41, 8 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  01:46, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:42, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:42, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Totally fails notability. He is one of seven or eight candidates for the Democratic nomination for governor, but hasn't a snowball's chance of getting the nomination. His only previous "fame" seems to be that he ran for mayor of Newark, California, a town of about 40,000 - and lost, 80% to 20%. I'm sure he's a nice guy and all, but he fails WP:Politician. No need to merge to California gubernatorial election, 2010 because his name is already there. --MelanieN (talk) 20:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I hadn't even thought to look at California gubernatorial election, 2010. (#brainfail) A redirect there would make some sense, but I can't see expanding him beyond the list entry there, given the massive lack of coverage.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  20:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per above. David V Houston (talk) 00:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.