Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vibgyor High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Vibgyor High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This page is a mess, full of content that looks like the work of a few angry parents and students. I don't see very much about it in news media except one story so I don't think it meets the notability guidelines. Teewikit (talk) 12:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC) — Teewikit (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete: I agree with Teewikit, this page reads like WP:ATTACK. Also, the notability of the individual school is not clear. Perhaps of the school organization, but that is not established here. -- BenTels (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep You can find plenty of independent sources in the  news media. In my opinion this high school meets WP:SCHOOL and the article is expandable/fixable. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep under per se notability of secondary schools. I agree with the nominator that the page is a mess. —Carrite Sept. 25, 2010.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Page needs to be fixed, but high schools are judged notable unless shown otherwise. Suggest stubbing per WP:ATTACK. LK (talk) 12:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep High schools are generally considered notable. POV problems should be dealt with by editing, not deletion, and it appears a lot of the negative points are sourced. Edward321 (talk) 23:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - need for cleaning is not grounds for deletion. Can be easily sourced to meet WP:ORG. TerriersFan (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.