Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vibodha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Vibodha

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in general media. Terminology from Fringe topic and violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are books on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Venkat TL (talk) 09:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  10:41, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 09:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a copyright violation. Another article, Pashyanti, created by the same user was just speedily deleted in the middle of a deletion discussion for the same reason. I'm finding pieces of the article at a website that appears to compile lists of sentences from other sources that contain a specified word. In this case, I found passages from the article verbatim here and here, which I'd presume were in turn taken from the sources referenced in the article. Largoplazo (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I just noticed that the author, User:Aditya soni, hasn't edited any currently extant pages since 2015, and that these are old articles. It occurred to me that these articles only now being brought to AFD are so old that I could be wrong (as could be the editor who called out copyvios on the Pashyanti article), and the sources we're finding are from Wikipedia mirrors. I question that because the sentences there aren't in the same order as they are here. Anyway, if we're right, however, then I note that this editor created 253 pages, of which 22 have been deleted so far. I'm wondering whether other pages created by the same user should be reviewed. Largoplazo (talk) 23:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I've removed the G12 tag, the cited websites appear to be spam mirrors. This isn't a comment on the content of the rest of the article. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 21:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I've now blanked the article as a copyright violation and listed it at Copyright problems/2021 November 16. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 23:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.