Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VibrantSharer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

VibrantSharer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Future website still under development, doesn't meet WP:NWEB. Though there is one possibly independent reference in the article, no substantive coverage found via Google. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Company /product does not meet WP:GNG, the one reference it gives does not seem reliable nor are there any others found via Google. Beakermeep (talk) 04:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Way too soon for an article.  Google returns almost no results, which is always a bad sign when trying to establish notability.  Try again after the website launches and gets a bit of publicity. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.