Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vibrational psychology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 00:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Vibrational psychology
Self-admited neologism. Google hits all seems to commercial sites using this term to sell stuff without providing any real info. Two of the external links do not atcually mention "Vibrational psychology" and the third is selling a course on it which is supposed to be a "meeting of Ancient Mysticism and Quantum Physics". I am left with the impression that neologism is just a sales term with nothing encyclopedic to say on the subject Birgitte SB  22:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of widespread use outside of the inventors. - Richfife 22:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No references, the stuff provided as external links is bunk.  This article can go.  &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 22:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It's pretty much a foregone conclusion that anything which uses the words Ancient Mysticism and Quantum Physics in the same sentence is going to be non notable bilge.Nick mallory 02:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 02:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - self-admitted neologism, which does not appear to be notable. --Haemo 05:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some satisfactory sources can be dug up. I couldn't find any.  Ford MF 08:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I looked for sources, but couldn't find any. This also suggests that it's non-notable. *Cremepuff  222*  19:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as all above. JJL 23:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. JoshuaZ 02:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.