Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicinity of Obscenity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Hypnotize (album).  Kurykh  06:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Vicinity of Obscenity

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is without sources and also completely fails the notability criteria as it hasn't been performed by any artists, won any awards or been covered in sufficient independent works. It is also pretty redundant to the main album article, Hypnotize (album). Seraphim Whipp 11:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hypnotize (album). There doesn't appear to be independent coverage of the single itself. It hasn't been performed by any artists? What about the artists who recorded it? --Onorem♠Dil 11:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Any other artists ;). Seraphim  Whipp 11:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - I agree. This article appears incomplete and will probably go better if redirected to the completed album. TheInfinityZero 15:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hypnotize (album). The song isn't notable enouh for it its own article, but redirecting it to the album does no harm.   Sasha Callahan   15:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there a reason that the other singles get their own articles? There's a whole "chronology"; they seem to have released so many "singles". There must be some material on the infamous lyrics of this song, if anything. ALTON   .ıl  07:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Response. I'm guessing the reason is that they have been released independently as singles so they have charted. I was actually quite impressed by Lonely Day because by the time I had found it, I'd already looked at this article and another that was in poor shape. I did look for sources discussing the lyrics but I could only find forum type, song meaning websites. Seraphim  Whipp 09:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That's a good idea. Yeah, I looked through the other one that is only one or two lines long. But then again, even if an article is of particular crap quality, if it's notable it's gotta stay. I have no idea about this, so we'll see how it turns out. ALTON   .ıl  02:34, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That's the thing, I think this one fails the notability criteria outlined by WP:MUSIC. It isn't a particular special song for any reason as it has won no awards/been nominated, hasn't been released as a charting single and has no sources or chance of any ever being found. It's a shame because I thought someone reviewer would at least have written about the interesting lyrics. Seraphim  Whipp 09:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.