Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicki Davis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Vicki Davis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non notable actor, no evidence of substantial secondary sources online. Inappropriately sourced using just IMDB since 2008. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep Weak Delete: Just conceivably the subject's roles in Maybe It's Me (TV series) and Odd Man Out (American TV series) pass the WP:NACTOR threshold, although the shows themselves don't seem all that notable—however, finding sources is very difficult. Her name seems to be quite common, which doesn't help matters. This not-very-good source which provides nothing more than a passing mention may be referring to the subject, but I'm not sure: https://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2018/general-hospital-spoilers-gh-star-takes-on-brand-new-role-exciting-project-brings-big-drama/. Hopefully others will find some sources; otherwise I will likely downgrade my vote. Dflaw4 (talk) 10:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete no where near enough sourcing to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —&thinsp; J 947  (user &#124; cont &#124; ess), at 22:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 02:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Updating my vote above: I've done a more discriminating search at newspapers.com, but all the coverage I've found is pretty minor. I see that no one else has had any luck sources-wise either. The subject only has a weak case for WP:NACTOR, too, as I opined above, so I'm downgrading my vote to "Weak Delete". Dflaw4 (talk) 01:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: A problem is the subject (a BLP) lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to support a stand alone article. This article joins approximately 1100 others where IMDb is used as a source but is inappropriate. We end up with a pseudo biography (one paragraph) that contains one or more embedded lists of entertainment credits. Wikipedia is not a listing of all things entertainment nor an advertising venue for IMDb. Otr500 (talk) 06:29, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.