Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicki Huff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Vicki Huff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Cannot find independent sources to verify notability. Natureium (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:PROF with an h-index of 38 on the Web of Science and 40 on Google Scholar, which is more widely inclusive. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:PROF as explained in the vote above. Thsmi002 (talk) 03:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, although this is very borderline. While the citation count is good, these were all group papers, with several authors.  If the count was simply on items they hade authored solely, this would be a slam dunk keep. Onel 5969  TT me 14:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.