Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicoustic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Vicoustic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable company; references are all press releases, made by sock of prolific COI editor. jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:09, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:54, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:54, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- WP:PROMO cited to press releases or otherwise non independent coverage. WP:CORPDEPTH not met and generally spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as non-notable and very plainly promotional in intent. --Lockley (talk) 05:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. I kept looking for an assertion of significance, but was always struck by the promotional nature of the thing. Little original to add to what's gone before.Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG -- HighKing ++ 17:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.