Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victa Westlink Rail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Esken. Salvio giuliano 19:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Victa Westlink Rail

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn’t have sources, few sources online, only model trains. I don’t think anyone knows about this rail system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manny Manatee (talk • contribs) 17:14, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 16:19, 23 March 2023 (UTC)


 * "only model trains" is irrelevant to the discussion and I don't see why it was included Garuda3 (talk) 17:52, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Were you able to find sources? I was expecting to myself, but I couldn't find anything secondary that was more than a passing mention. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll take that as a no, then. Guess you just wanted to complain. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 12:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Selective merge and redirect into Esken. Probably also rename the target section as early history in the 21st century may sound a bit off for some readers. Something like the little-used "Lead-up" would communicate temporal relevance. TO THE CORE of the merge suggestion, Victa Westlink Rail existed less than a year and some of the article's content is missing in the very short target section. As things stand, there is no justification for an independent article on this, in hindsight, transitional company. gidonb (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge: Agree with above, a very select merge by an ~SME.  // Timothy :: talk  20:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Esken. I do not say merge only because there is no sourced content in this article to merge in the first place. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 12:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.