Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor B. Tosi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 00:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Victor B. Tosi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

fails WP:BIO. Coverage is either from the Party website or minor snippets within articles about other figures. Ironholds (talk) 00:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  —  Jujutacular  T · C 01:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  —  Jujutacular  T · C 01:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. http://www.villagevoice.com/2000-06-20/news/once-and-again/ (cited as one of the references) is all about Tosi. As for the other references, a reference need not be primarily about the subject of an article to be useful. - Eastmain (talk) 03:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No, but it does need to provide significant coverage, not soundbite reference to him. Ironholds (talk) 12:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm seeing a good deal of secondary source coverage, . Cirt (talk) 14:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 04:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - He was never even a has been. He presided over the continuing decline of the GOP in The Bronx. The GOP is a truly minority party there - only about 6 % of the vote or enrollment. Bearian (talk) 16:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep has enough 3rd party coverage to pass WP:BIO RP459 (talk) 18:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per, enough secondary coverage here to indicate notability. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC).
 * Keep Appears to have enough coverage in the media.  Jujutacular  T · C 19:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, The provided sources clearly establish notability . Rirunmot (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 23:50, 2 January 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete of local interest only, article makes no particular claim of notability. Abductive  (reasoning) 23:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep a borough party chairman in NYC is influential politically.    DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.