Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Bianchini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draft-ify. Article already moved to draft by creator, and commenters in the discussion seem fine with that. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Victor Bianchini

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced BLP that reads as an advertisement/resume. Does not appear to meet GNG. – DarkGlow ( ✉ ) 16:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow ( ✉ ) 16:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow ( ✉ ) 16:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow ( ✉ ) 16:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment/draftify. I don't know how the California state judiciary works. According to the (unsourced) article, he was a "California Superior Court Judge, San Diego County". Per WP:NJUDGE, is this a statewide office, or a county-wide office? In any event, this very new article should probably be draftified to (1) add sources and (2) demonstrate notability, as both WP:NPOL/WP:NJUDGE and WP:SOLDIER look plausible, but as we can't keep an unsourced BLP in mainspace (this technically qualifies for WP:BLPPROD), it should be draftified for improvement and de-promo-ization. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 16:16, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. The California superior courts are the trial courts in California -- the lowest level of courts there. For a statewide judge, one would need to be on the Supreme Court of California. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:10, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, this article has already been moved to draftspace, so this AfD should probably be closed. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment although the decision was made prematurely, I agree with it, and the discussion should be closed, unless anyone disagrees. – DarkGlow ( ✉ ) 18:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Not making this a draft in the first place was my mistake, which I corrected as soon as it was pointed out. Thanks for all the advice and feedback, I think everyone is in agreement. Glenn Anderson (talk) 21:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. It's already been deleted. Bearian (talk) 19:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.