Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor E. Marsden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. (non-admin closure) buidhe 06:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Victor E. Marsden

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is a remnant of the chaos User:Ludvikus was strewing around The Protocols of the Elders of Zion for quite a while before he was banned. The content of this article relates to Ludvikus' obsession with using Wikipedia to further his research into the publishing history of the Protocols; pretty much nothing is known about the subject otherwise, and the whole thing can be a sentence in the Protocols article, if even that. "Someone named Marsden is credited with some of the editions." --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 18:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Author-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Selective merge if any RSed/non-OR material here doesn't appear in the main article already. This is definitely original research, about someone who clearly doesn't seem to be notable. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 21:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah. It's really a shame, too. Ludvikus was an intrepid researcher, gleaning all sorts of interesting detail (and less interesting marginalia) about the Protocols and their publication. But working with Wikipedia was not in his constitution, I think. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 23:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 02:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This serves as a coatrack to talk about the levels of publication of antisemitic works, Henry Ford, his publications and Dearborn and other topics. It shows no actual notability for Marsden and as a coatrack is avoiding putting those topics in their proper context.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.