Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Lau (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 02:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Victor Lau

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.--NL19931993 (talk) 22:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as meeting WP:GNG based on the sources. No indication nom did a before on any of the Green Party leaders they AFD'd. ミラP 00:27, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Lau has gotten a little routine, province-level news coverage for being elected leader of a minor (small) provincial-level political party. It takes more than that to be regarded as a notable political actor.NotButtigieg (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:ROUTINE already was shown not to apply to people. ミラP 20:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Following the link you provided leads to WP:POLITICIAN, which make clear that political figures who have not held one of a number of specified offices need to have gotten "significant coverage" in the media. Lau has not gotten such coverage.NotButtigieg (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete the announcements of winning elections for the party are not a sign of passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - consensus has changed on minor party leaders, but not on Perennial candidates such as this. There is some ongoing coverage and evidence online. Bearian (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 22:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Following my speedy close of the DRV at Deletion review/Log/2020 January 10 I am relisting this. Note that the nominator's opinion should be discounted, as they have been banned, but subsequent good faith !votes should be assessed as normal.
 * Delete - Fails WP:NPOL & WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 00:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete In agreement with those above, fails WP:POLOUTCOMES because he is the leader of a minor party with no other real claim to notability. Plus, these sources shouldn't satisfy GNG because they're pretty standard for any political candidate. TheAnayalator (talk) 05:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG - none of the sources are significant coverage, which isn't surprising for the leader of a minor party. SportingFlyer  T · C  11:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.