Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Zammit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 04:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Victor Zammit

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Tagged for notablity in 2010 and its only sources are Zammit's own webpage. Looking at his one book, it is unnotable and self-published. Doesn't appear notable per WP:BIO for author. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 23:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - agree with the above. --EPadmirateur (talk) 01:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't comport with notability guidelines. Another shameless self-promoter trying to misuse Wikipedia for free publicity.--Hokeman (talk) 02:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - sourced entirely from his own web site, and no apparent claim to meet the notability guidelines. --  Transity  ( talk &bull;  contribs ) 23:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources.--Sloane (talk) 02:53, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete- Per WP:BIO. Monterey Bay (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of apparent notability. Usual caveats apply, however. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:14, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.