Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Zavgorodnij


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete -- ( &#x263A; drini &#x266B; | &#x260E; ) 02:30, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Victor Zavgorodnij
nn - maybe vanity &asymp; jossi &asymp; 03:28, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Without Zavgorodnij, Kadochnikov system would not have recieved it's patent, and he still actively teaches today. His name is well respected in the Russian martial art world. If you are to put Kadochnikov, Vasiliev, Ryabko, and Retuinskih on this site, his name should not be excluded. He figures majorly into Kadochnikov system. (Unsigned comment by Russinfo this is his first contribution to Wikipedia.)
 * Delete 3 distinct google hits puts him well below even the most generous notability reading. Agree it could be vanity, although it is probably not speediable. Dottore So 19:40, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Dottore So. -- Kjkolb 23:45, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Following the links from this article, it would appear that this is part of a series of articles on Russian martial arts. If so, then it wouldn't surprise me that a Google search would result in so few hits. No, I don't know if this is a hoax or some sort nationalistic cultural myth . . . but how much would it hurt to leave this article in Wikipedia (cleaned up, of course because the links & grammar in this article are atrocious) until someone can research this matter further? And if it is proven a hoax, then we can harvest a large number of articles here with a minimum of fuss. (BTW, unsigned comments do not help to convince people to keep this article.) -- llywrch 23:56, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn/vanity -- red stucco 08:54, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.